The Inwards Story Of How Peyton Manning – s Alleged Sexual Onslaught Victim Reignited A 20-Year-Old Accusation

The Inwards Story Of How Peyton Manning's Alleged Sexual Attack Victim Reignited A 20-Year-Old Accusation

The most latest twist in the Peyton Manning alleged sexual brunt saga came Tuesday, when Sports Plus Demonstrate founder and producer Tom Stokes released a recorded phone call with who he says is Dr. Jamie Naughright. It was Naughright who accused Manning of sexual attack at the University of Tennessee in 1996. The bizarre call focused mostly on Naughright’s claim that Manning is gay.

In a phone interview with Talk Sports Tuesday night, Stokes detailed how that conversation with Naughright came about, as well as the other claims that Naughright made in their conversation. Stokes is adamant that he spoke with the real Naughright, and says he has the phone records and text messages to prove it.

The Manning-Naughright issue is a lengthy and complicated one that dates back to 1994, as detailed by the Knoxville News-Sentinel. The main issue stems from a sexual brunt claim against Manning, one of many incidents that Naughright detailed in a lawsuit against Tennessee that resulted in a $300,000 settlement. There were a pair of lawsuits against Manning from Naughright, stemming the alleged disturbance of the confidentially agreement. There was nothing on the sexual attack after 2005, until a few days following the Super Cup.

A Title IX lawsuit was filed against Tennessee on February 9th, claiming the school created a hostile sexual environment. The Manning incident was mentioned as an example. On February 13th, Shaun King of the Fresh York Daily News published an article based on the documents submitted by Naughright’s lawyers from the defamation lawsuit. While the story has continued to garner attention, Naughright has not said anything publicly. Expect to Stokes.

According to Stokes, Naughright herself reached out to him to discuss the Manning situation.

"She got in touch with me through Facebook," Stokes said. "Two or three months ago she popped up on my friend requests and I just approved her. Anyway, a duo of months go by and I go ‘that name sounds familiar.’ I reached out to her and said ‘hey, are you the same Jamie from the Peyton Manning story?’ It was a duo days later she hit me back and said ‘yeah I am.’"

Stokes said he dreamed to discuss the story with Naughright and told her to call. She did, on the night of February 13th, the same day that King’s story broke. Stokes recorded the conversation with Naughright as he was driving to a concert. A portion of that call is embedded below. Note: there is NSFW language used in the audio.

Stokes said he was "floored" by the details from Naughright.

"[I thought] ‘I can’t believe she’s telling this right now,’" Stokes said. "The only thing she’s telling me she truly wants, besides money, is her life aim is to bring down the Manning family. She said ‘I want to bring down the Manning family . I want Peyton to go online and admit that he gargles c**k.’"

Stokes originally didn’t plan to release the audio. But, he said he became fed up with the treatment of Manning in the media and the acceptance of the story from a woman who he is wooed is not telling the truth.

"I wasn’t going to post anything online," Stokes said. "I indeed wasn’t. Because I sat on that for seven days and I only just posted that. I wasn’t going to do anything, but then I kept hearing and reading all this stuff that says ‘Peyton is a sexual predator,’ ‘Peyton did this, Peyton did that,’ and everybody is staying in her corner, telling ‘poor damsel.’ And I just called bulls**t on that. I posted it and said ‘let the cards fall where they will.’ What made me determine to post it was that I was tired of hearing just one side of this."

The audio that Stokes released is one of three portions he says he has. The very first, and the one embedded above, concentrates mostly on Naughright’s claims that Manning is gay. The other two detail a conspiracy theory that Naughright claims is occurring. Stokes says she told him that she fears Roger Goodell is out to get her. The final chunk, Stokes says, features Naughright confessing to reaching out to other media members, such as Shaun King.

"I think she just looking around, because she admitted to me that she got in touch with a duo of other guys," Stokes said. "And that’s where the entire thing came in with Shaun King and that’s where I embarked connecting dots."

Stokes doesn’t plan on releasing those other two audio files, despite requests from his "media pals" to send the Shaun King information. But Stokes won’t be the only one with those audio files for much longer. Stokes says he spoke with Daniel P. Chung from the rock hard Gipson Dunn just before his call with Talk Sports. It’s the same rigid that represented Manning during the HGH accusations. Stokes says he agreed to send the rock-hard all of his audio files. Stokes doesn’t expect the rigid to release the audio files, albeit he said they didn’t tell him what they planned to do with the files.

Stokes says he didn’t release the audio files for money, nor is he making up the claims. At very first, he said he felt sympathy for Naughright. But after speaking with her, he’s "100 percent" coaxed that Manning’s version is the accurate one.

The Manning-Naughright issue is a lengthy and complicated one that dates back to 1994. It began with an incident involving Manning and Naughright that has since been sealed and may have involved allegations of academic misconduct by Manning. In February 1996, there was another incident inbetween Manning and Naughright. Manning claimed it was a mooning/prank gone wrong. Naughright said Manning placed his glutes, testicles and rectum on her face, albeit the contact part was not mentioned in court documents until a few years later. However, she called a sexual brunt hotline that night, as the Knoxville-News reported in 1996. In August 1996, Naughright filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against Tennessee. The suit cites twenty seven instances, including the Manning incident. Tennessee lodges with Naughright for $300,000, but only acknowledges three of the incidents as actual examples of sexual harassment. The rest, including the Manning incident, were "horseplay that could not be avoided."

Naughright would file a defamation lawsuit against Manning over a book published in May 2000. The book described her as "vulgar" and downplayed the one thousand nine hundred ninety six incident, which she said led to her demotion at Florida Southern College. A settlement was reached in December 2003. Naughright would again sue Manning in January two thousand five claiming Manning broke the confidentially agreement in an interview with ESPN. A documentary on Manning discusses the incident with Manning, but Manning himself did not speak about the event. Naughright filed for a dismissal of the suit in March 2005. That was the end of the incident until the Tennessee Title IX lawsuit and King’s story brought it back into the public eye.

Stokes says he’s simply attempting to get the truth out there.

"Very first of all, I’m from Fresh Orleans," Stokes said, alluding to his fandom of Archie Manning. "2nd, I’ve had some issues happen with me with women in the past. It’s not joy when you’re on that side and no one listens or hears your side. They only hear the victim, the victim, the victim. It just wasn’t like that. She [Naughright] is not the victim like everyone thinks she is."

The Inwards Story Of How Peyton Manning – s Alleged Sexual Attack Victim Reignited A 20-Year-Old Accusation

The Inwards Story Of How Peyton Manning's Alleged Sexual Brunt Victim Reignited A 20-Year-Old Accusation

The most latest twist in the Peyton Manning alleged sexual onslaught saga came Tuesday, when Sports Plus Display founder and producer Tom Stokes released a recorded phone call with who he says is Dr. Jamie Naughright. It was Naughright who accused Manning of sexual onslaught at the University of Tennessee in 1996. The bizarre call focused mostly on Naughright’s claim that Manning is gay.

In a phone interview with Talk Sports Tuesday night, Stokes detailed how that conversation with Naughright came about, as well as the other claims that Naughright made in their conversation. Stokes is adamant that he spoke with the real Naughright, and says he has the phone records and text messages to prove it.

The Manning-Naughright issue is a lengthy and complicated one that dates back to 1994, as detailed by the Knoxville News-Sentinel. The main issue stems from a sexual onslaught claim against Manning, one of many incidents that Naughright detailed in a lawsuit against Tennessee that resulted in a $300,000 settlement. There were a pair of lawsuits against Manning from Naughright, stemming the alleged disturbance of the confidentially agreement. There was nothing on the sexual onslaught after 2005, until a few days following the Super Cup.

A Title IX lawsuit was filed against Tennessee on February 9th, claiming the school created a hostile sexual environment. The Manning incident was mentioned as an example. On February 13th, Shaun King of the Fresh York Daily News published an article based on the documents submitted by Naughright’s lawyers from the defamation lawsuit. While the story has continued to garner attention, Naughright has not said anything publicly. Expect to Stokes.

According to Stokes, Naughright herself reached out to him to discuss the Manning situation.

"She got in touch with me through Facebook," Stokes said. "Two or three months ago she popped up on my friend requests and I just approved her. Anyway, a duo of months go by and I go ‘that name sounds familiar.’ I reached out to her and said ‘hey, are you the same Jamie from the Peyton Manning story?’ It was a duo days later she hit me back and said ‘yeah I am.’"

Stokes said he dreamed to discuss the story with Naughright and told her to call. She did, on the night of February 13th, the same day that King’s story broke. Stokes recorded the conversation with Naughright as he was driving to a concert. A portion of that call is embedded below. Note: there is NSFW language used in the audio.

Stokes said he was "floored" by the details from Naughright.

"[I thought] ‘I can’t believe she’s telling this right now,’" Stokes said. "The only thing she’s telling me she indeed wants, besides money, is her life objective is to bring down the Manning family. She said ‘I want to bring down the Manning family . I want Peyton to go online and admit that he deep-throats c**k.’"

Stokes originally didn’t plan to release the audio. But, he said he became fed up with the treatment of Manning in the media and the acceptance of the story from a woman who he is wooed is not telling the truth.

"I wasn’t going to post anything online," Stokes said. "I truly wasn’t. Because I sat on that for seven days and I only just posted that. I wasn’t going to do anything, but then I kept hearing and reading all this stuff that says ‘Peyton is a sexual predator,’ ‘Peyton did this, Peyton did that,’ and everybody is staying in her corner, telling ‘poor dame.’ And I just called bulls**t on that. I posted it and said ‘let the cards fall where they will.’ What made me determine to post it was that I was tired of hearing just one side of this."

The audio that Stokes released is one of three portions he says he has. The very first, and the one embedded above, concentrates mostly on Naughright’s claims that Manning is gay. The other two detail a conspiracy theory that Naughright claims is occurring. Stokes says she told him that she fears Roger Goodell is out to get her. The final chunk, Stokes says, features Naughright confessing to reaching out to other media members, such as Shaun King.

"I think she just looking around, because she admitted to me that she got in touch with a duo of other guys," Stokes said. "And that’s where the entire thing came in with Shaun King and that’s where I commenced connecting dots."

Stokes doesn’t plan on releasing those other two audio files, despite requests from his "media pals" to send the Shaun King information. But Stokes won’t be the only one with those audio files for much longer. Stokes says he spoke with Daniel P. Chung from the rock hard Gipson Dunn just before his call with Talk Sports. It’s the same rigid that represented Manning during the HGH accusations. Stokes says he agreed to send the rigid all of his audio files. Stokes doesn’t expect the stiff to release the audio files, albeit he said they didn’t tell him what they planned to do with the files.

Stokes says he didn’t release the audio files for money, nor is he making up the claims. At very first, he said he felt sympathy for Naughright. But after speaking with her, he’s "100 percent" persuaded that Manning’s version is the accurate one.

The Manning-Naughright issue is a lengthy and complicated one that dates back to 1994. It began with an incident involving Manning and Naughright that has since been sealed and may have involved allegations of academic misconduct by Manning. In February 1996, there was another incident inbetween Manning and Naughright. Manning claimed it was a mooning/prank gone wrong. Naughright said Manning placed his ass-cheeks, testicles and rectum on her face, albeit the contact part was not mentioned in court documents until a few years later. However, she called a sexual brunt hotline that night, as the Knoxville-News reported in 1996. In August 1996, Naughright filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against Tennessee. The suit cites twenty seven instances, including the Manning incident. Tennessee lodges with Naughright for $300,000, but only acknowledges three of the incidents as actual examples of sexual harassment. The rest, including the Manning incident, were "horseplay that could not be avoided."

Naughright would file a defamation lawsuit against Manning over a book published in May 2000. The book described her as "vulgar" and downplayed the one thousand nine hundred ninety six incident, which she said led to her demotion at Florida Southern College. A settlement was reached in December 2003. Naughright would again sue Manning in January two thousand five claiming Manning broke the confidentially agreement in an interview with ESPN. A documentary on Manning discusses the incident with Manning, but Manning himself did not speak about the event. Naughright filed for a dismissal of the suit in March 2005. That was the end of the incident until the Tennessee Title IX lawsuit and King’s story brought it back into the public eye.

Stokes says he’s simply attempting to get the truth out there.

"Very first of all, I’m from Fresh Orleans," Stokes said, alluding to his fandom of Archie Manning. "2nd, I’ve had some issues happen with me with women in the past. It’s not joy when you’re on that side and no one listens or hears your side. They only hear the victim, the victim, the victim. It just wasn’t like that. She [Naughright] is not the victim like everyone thinks she is."

The Inwards Story Of How Peyton Manning – s Alleged Sexual Onslaught Victim Reignited A 20-Year-Old Accusation

The Inwards Story Of How Peyton Manning's Alleged Sexual Attack Victim Reignited A 20-Year-Old Accusation

The most latest twist in the Peyton Manning alleged sexual attack saga came Tuesday, when Sports Plus Demonstrate founder and producer Tom Stokes released a recorded phone call with who he says is Dr. Jamie Naughright. It was Naughright who accused Manning of sexual attack at the University of Tennessee in 1996. The bizarre call focused mostly on Naughright’s claim that Manning is gay.

In a phone interview with Talk Sports Tuesday night, Stokes detailed how that conversation with Naughright came about, as well as the other claims that Naughright made in their conversation. Stokes is adamant that he spoke with the real Naughright, and says he has the phone records and text messages to prove it.

The Manning-Naughright issue is a lengthy and complicated one that dates back to 1994, as detailed by the Knoxville News-Sentinel. The main issue stems from a sexual brunt claim against Manning, one of many incidents that Naughright detailed in a lawsuit against Tennessee that resulted in a $300,000 settlement. There were a pair of lawsuits against Manning from Naughright, stemming the alleged disturbance of the confidentially agreement. There was nothing on the sexual attack after 2005, until a few days following the Super Cup.

A Title IX lawsuit was filed against Tennessee on February 9th, claiming the school created a hostile sexual environment. The Manning incident was mentioned as an example. On February 13th, Shaun King of the Fresh York Daily News published an article based on the documents submitted by Naughright’s lawyers from the defamation lawsuit. While the story has continued to garner attention, Naughright has not said anything publicly. Expect to Stokes.

According to Stokes, Naughright herself reached out to him to discuss the Manning situation.

"She got in touch with me through Facebook," Stokes said. "Two or three months ago she popped up on my friend requests and I just approved her. Anyway, a duo of months go by and I go ‘that name sounds familiar.’ I reached out to her and said ‘hey, are you the same Jamie from the Peyton Manning story?’ It was a duo days later she hit me back and said ‘yeah I am.’"

Stokes said he wished to discuss the story with Naughright and told her to call. She did, on the night of February 13th, the same day that King’s story broke. Stokes recorded the conversation with Naughright as he was driving to a concert. A portion of that call is embedded below. Note: there is NSFW language used in the audio.

Stokes said he was "floored" by the details from Naughright.

"[I thought] ‘I can’t believe she’s telling this right now,’" Stokes said. "The only thing she’s telling me she indeed wants, besides money, is her life objective is to bring down the Manning family. She said ‘I want to bring down the Manning family . I want Peyton to go online and admit that he deep-throats c**k.’"

Stokes originally didn’t plan to release the audio. But, he said he became fed up with the treatment of Manning in the media and the acceptance of the story from a woman who he is wooed is not telling the truth.

"I wasn’t going to post anything online," Stokes said. "I truly wasn’t. Because I sat on that for seven days and I only just posted that. I wasn’t going to do anything, but then I kept hearing and reading all this stuff that says ‘Peyton is a sexual predator,’ ‘Peyton did this, Peyton did that,’ and everybody is staying in her corner, telling ‘poor damsel.’ And I just called bulls**t on that. I posted it and said ‘let the cards fall where they will.’ What made me determine to post it was that I was tired of hearing just one side of this."

The audio that Stokes released is one of three portions he says he has. The very first, and the one embedded above, concentrates mostly on Naughright’s claims that Manning is gay. The other two detail a conspiracy theory that Naughright claims is occurring. Stokes says she told him that she fears Roger Goodell is out to get her. The final chunk, Stokes says, features Naughright confessing to reaching out to other media members, such as Shaun King.

"I think she just looking around, because she admitted to me that she got in touch with a duo of other guys," Stokes said. "And that’s where the entire thing came in with Shaun King and that’s where I embarked connecting dots."

Stokes doesn’t plan on releasing those other two audio files, despite requests from his "media pals" to send the Shaun King information. But Stokes won’t be the only one with those audio files for much longer. Stokes says he spoke with Daniel P. Chung from the stiff Gipson Dunn just before his call with Talk Sports. It’s the same stiff that represented Manning during the HGH accusations. Stokes says he agreed to send the rigid all of his audio files. Stokes doesn’t expect the rigid to release the audio files, albeit he said they didn’t tell him what they planned to do with the files.

Stokes says he didn’t release the audio files for money, nor is he making up the claims. At very first, he said he felt sympathy for Naughright. But after speaking with her, he’s "100 percent" coaxed that Manning’s version is the accurate one.

The Manning-Naughright issue is a lengthy and complicated one that dates back to 1994. It began with an incident involving Manning and Naughright that has since been sealed and may have involved allegations of academic misconduct by Manning. In February 1996, there was another incident inbetween Manning and Naughright. Manning claimed it was a mooning/prank gone wrong. Naughright said Manning placed his buns, testicles and rectum on her face, albeit the contact part was not mentioned in court documents until a few years later. However, she called a sexual attack hotline that night, as the Knoxville-News reported in 1996. In August 1996, Naughright filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against Tennessee. The suit cites twenty seven instances, including the Manning incident. Tennessee lodges with Naughright for $300,000, but only acknowledges three of the incidents as actual examples of sexual harassment. The rest, including the Manning incident, were "horseplay that could not be avoided."

Naughright would file a defamation lawsuit against Manning over a book published in May 2000. The book described her as "vulgar" and downplayed the one thousand nine hundred ninety six incident, which she said led to her demotion at Florida Southern College. A settlement was reached in December 2003. Naughright would again sue Manning in January two thousand five claiming Manning broke the confidentially agreement in an interview with ESPN. A documentary on Manning discusses the incident with Manning, but Manning himself did not speak about the event. Naughright filed for a dismissal of the suit in March 2005. That was the end of the incident until the Tennessee Title IX lawsuit and King’s story brought it back into the public eye.

Stokes says he’s simply attempting to get the truth out there.

"Very first of all, I’m from Fresh Orleans," Stokes said, alluding to his fandom of Archie Manning. "2nd, I’ve had some issues happen with me with women in the past. It’s not joy when you’re on that side and no one listens or hears your side. They only hear the victim, the victim, the victim. It just wasn’t like that. She [Naughright] is not the victim like everyone thinks she is."

The Inwards Story Of How Peyton Manning – s Alleged Sexual Onslaught Victim Reignited A 20-Year-Old Accusation

The Inwards Story Of How Peyton Manning's Alleged Sexual Onslaught Victim Reignited A 20-Year-Old Accusation

The most latest twist in the Peyton Manning alleged sexual onslaught saga came Tuesday, when Sports Plus Showcase founder and producer Tom Stokes released a recorded phone call with who he says is Dr. Jamie Naughright. It was Naughright who accused Manning of sexual brunt at the University of Tennessee in 1996. The bizarre call focused mostly on Naughright’s claim that Manning is gay.

In a phone interview with Talk Sports Tuesday night, Stokes detailed how that conversation with Naughright came about, as well as the other claims that Naughright made in their conversation. Stokes is adamant that he spoke with the real Naughright, and says he has the phone records and text messages to prove it.

The Manning-Naughright issue is a lengthy and complicated one that dates back to 1994, as detailed by the Knoxville News-Sentinel. The main issue stems from a sexual brunt claim against Manning, one of many incidents that Naughright detailed in a lawsuit against Tennessee that resulted in a $300,000 settlement. There were a pair of lawsuits against Manning from Naughright, stemming the alleged disturbance of the confidentially agreement. There was nothing on the sexual brunt after 2005, until a few days following the Super Cup.

A Title IX lawsuit was filed against Tennessee on February 9th, claiming the school created a hostile sexual environment. The Manning incident was mentioned as an example. On February 13th, Shaun King of the Fresh York Daily News published an article based on the documents submitted by Naughright’s lawyers from the defamation lawsuit. While the story has continued to garner attention, Naughright has not said anything publicly. Expect to Stokes.

According to Stokes, Naughright herself reached out to him to discuss the Manning situation.

"She got in touch with me through Facebook," Stokes said. "Two or three months ago she popped up on my friend requests and I just approved her. Anyway, a duo of months go by and I go ‘that name sounds familiar.’ I reached out to her and said ‘hey, are you the same Jamie from the Peyton Manning story?’ It was a duo days later she hit me back and said ‘yeah I am.’"

Stokes said he dreamed to discuss the story with Naughright and told her to call. She did, on the night of February 13th, the same day that King’s story broke. Stokes recorded the conversation with Naughright as he was driving to a concert. A portion of that call is embedded below. Note: there is NSFW language used in the audio.

Stokes said he was "floored" by the details from Naughright.

"[I thought] ‘I can’t believe she’s telling this right now,’" Stokes said. "The only thing she’s telling me she indeed wants, besides money, is her life objective is to bring down the Manning family. She said ‘I want to bring down the Manning family . I want Peyton to go online and admit that he gargles c**k.’"

Stokes originally didn’t plan to release the audio. But, he said he became fed up with the treatment of Manning in the media and the acceptance of the story from a woman who he is coaxed is not telling the truth.

"I wasn’t going to post anything online," Stokes said. "I truly wasn’t. Because I sat on that for seven days and I only just posted that. I wasn’t going to do anything, but then I kept hearing and reading all this stuff that says ‘Peyton is a sexual predator,’ ‘Peyton did this, Peyton did that,’ and everybody is staying in her corner, telling ‘poor woman.’ And I just called bulls**t on that. I posted it and said ‘let the cards fall where they will.’ What made me determine to post it was that I was tired of hearing just one side of this."

The audio that Stokes released is one of three portions he says he has. The very first, and the one embedded above, concentrates mostly on Naughright’s claims that Manning is gay. The other two detail a conspiracy theory that Naughright claims is occurring. Stokes says she told him that she fears Roger Goodell is out to get her. The final lump, Stokes says, features Naughright confessing to reaching out to other media members, such as Shaun King.

"I think she just looking around, because she admitted to me that she got in touch with a duo of other guys," Stokes said. "And that’s where the entire thing came in with Shaun King and that’s where I embarked connecting dots."

Stokes doesn’t plan on releasing those other two audio files, despite requests from his "media pals" to send the Shaun King information. But Stokes won’t be the only one with those audio files for much longer. Stokes says he spoke with Daniel P. Chung from the rock-hard Gipson Dunn just before his call with Talk Sports. It’s the same stiff that represented Manning during the HGH accusations. Stokes says he agreed to send the hard all of his audio files. Stokes doesn’t expect the stiff to release the audio files, albeit he said they didn’t tell him what they planned to do with the files.

Stokes says he didn’t release the audio files for money, nor is he making up the claims. At very first, he said he felt sympathy for Naughright. But after speaking with her, he’s "100 percent" persuaded that Manning’s version is the accurate one.

The Manning-Naughright issue is a lengthy and complicated one that dates back to 1994. It began with an incident involving Manning and Naughright that has since been sealed and may have involved allegations of academic misconduct by Manning. In February 1996, there was another incident inbetween Manning and Naughright. Manning claimed it was a mooning/prank gone wrong. Naughright said Manning placed his ass cheeks, testicles and rectum on her face, albeit the contact part was not mentioned in court documents until a few years later. However, she called a sexual brunt hotline that night, as the Knoxville-News reported in 1996. In August 1996, Naughright filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against Tennessee. The suit cites twenty seven instances, including the Manning incident. Tennessee lodges with Naughright for $300,000, but only acknowledges three of the incidents as actual examples of sexual harassment. The rest, including the Manning incident, were "horseplay that could not be avoided."

Naughright would file a defamation lawsuit against Manning over a book published in May 2000. The book described her as "vulgar" and downplayed the one thousand nine hundred ninety six incident, which she said led to her demotion at Florida Southern College. A settlement was reached in December 2003. Naughright would again sue Manning in January two thousand five claiming Manning broke the confidentially agreement in an interview with ESPN. A documentary on Manning discusses the incident with Manning, but Manning himself did not speak about the event. Naughright filed for a dismissal of the suit in March 2005. That was the end of the incident until the Tennessee Title IX lawsuit and King’s story brought it back into the public eye.

Stokes says he’s simply attempting to get the truth out there.

"Very first of all, I’m from Fresh Orleans," Stokes said, alluding to his fandom of Archie Manning. "2nd, I’ve had some issues happen with me with women in the past. It’s not joy when you’re on that side and no one listens or hears your side. They only hear the victim, the victim, the victim. It just wasn’t like that. She [Naughright] is not the victim like everyone thinks she is."

Related video:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *